Position functions pricing towards the Hr-VOdos relations from the lab

Reproducibility out of regular unmarried specifications

There were no systematic absolute or relative differences in VO2 and HR between the first and second measurement occasion in the laboratory (Table 3).

The three submaximal work rates, used in both models of HR-VO2 regression equations, induced mean levels of HR ranging from on average 97 ± 8 to 139 ± 18 beats per minute for the males, and from 98 ± 8 to 150 ± 10 for the females (Table 3). For maximal HR and other descriptive aspects of the work rates used, see Tables 3 and 4.

Hour account out-of commuter bicycling used for estimating degrees of VO2

Brand new indicate philosophy of one’s 20% lowest, intermediate and you will highest pulse rate avenues during the commuter cycling and you will their indicate Hr values try discussed during the Desk 5.

Brand new imply degrees of the Hours (maybe not revealed) was indeed somewhat below the latest advanced 1/5 of proportions bought Hours. This can be once the reasonable step one/5 away from Hour is truly then from the intermediate step 1/5 compared to the point into large step 1/5 from Time.

Reproducibility away from Hour-VO2 regression equations and estimated degrees of VO2 (design 1)

The test and retest HR-VO2 regression equations and estimated levels of oxygen uptake from three levels of HR are presented in Tables 6 and 7. There was a tendency towards a lower y-intercept and a greater slope in the regression equations at the retest compared to the test (Table 6). Based on calculations of all subjects, there were no systematic differences in estimated absolute levels of VO2 between test and retest. The relative differences between test and retest were 0.99 ± 11.0 (n.s.), 2.67 ± 6.48 (p<0.1) and 3.57 ± 6.24% (p<0.05) based on estimations from the lowest to the highest levels of HR (Table 7). The individual data for all tables (Tables 6–11) related to evaluations of the HR-VO2 relations are given as Supporting Information S1 Results https://datingranking.net/pl/bbwcupid-recenzja/. The 95% limits of agreement for the individual variations in the differences in estimated VO2 between test and retest varied between -0.3155 and 0.2923) (L · min -1 ) for the low HR, -0.3922 and 0.2764 for the middle HR, and -0.4735 and 0.3029 for the high HR (Fig 2).

The y-axes show absolute differences in VO2 against the mean values of the estimations from the repeated measurements on the x-axes.

Reproducibility away from Hr-VO2 regression equations and projected amounts of VO2 (design 2)

The test and retest HR-VO2 regression equations and estimated levels of oxygen uptake from three levels of HR are presented in Tables 8 and 9. There were no significant differences between test and retest in the constituents of the regression equations (y-intercept, slope and r-value)(Table 8). Based on calculations of all subjects, there were no systematic differences in estimated absolute levels of oxygen uptake between test and retest. The relative differences between test and retest, based on estimations from three different levels of HR, were 1.09 ± 10.6, 1.75 ± 6.43 and 2.12 ± 5.92% (all n.s.)(Table 9). The 95% limits of agreement for the individual variations in the differences in estimated VO2 between test and retest varied between -0.2894 and 0.2684)(L · min -1 ) for the low HR, -0.3233 and 0.2539 for the middle HR, and -0.3649 and 0.2722 for the high HR (Fig 3).

The y-axes show absolute differences in VO2 against the mean values of the estimations from the repeated measurements on the x-axes.

Reviews for the regression equations and you can estimated VO2 involving the Time-VO2 connections during the design 1 and you will dos

The differences between the two HR-VO2 models in the y-intercept, slope, r-value as well as in the three levels of estimated VO2 at test and retest were compared for all subjects (Tables 10 and 11). All differences between the models were small and non-significant. The mean absolute and relative differences in VO2 varied from 0.00 ± 0.04 to -0.04 ± 0.10 liter/min (all n.s.) and 0.10 ± 3.39 to -1.46 ± 3.30% (all n.s.), respectively.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.